↓ Skip to main content

Progenitor-like cell type of an MLL-EDC4 fusion in acute myeloid leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Advances, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
Title
Progenitor-like cell type of an MLL-EDC4 fusion in acute myeloid leukemia
Published in
Blood Advances, November 2023
DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda C. Schuster, Afzal P. Syed, Stephan M. Tirier, Simon Steiger, Isabelle Seufert, Heiko Becker, Jesus Duque-Afonso, Tobias Ma, Seishi Ogawa, Jan-Philipp Mallm, Michael Lübbert, Karsten Rippe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,847,599
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Blood Advances
#1,042
of 3,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,115
of 353,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Advances
#52
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.